Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sad Beautiful Tragic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Red (Taylor Swift album). No prejudice against making this a stand-alone article in the future if enough content is written to justify it. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 14:58, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sad Beautiful Tragic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Should be deleted, with a redirection back to the parent album Red. Per WP:NSONGS, whilst charting does make a song a notable, notability aside there should be extensive coverage of the song as a primary subject. In this case there isnt, and chart positions could easily be added back to the album. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 17:21, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This passes NSONGS No. 2 criterion three-times.HotHat (talk) 22:30, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:22, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to the album. As with all the others, the chart positions for album tracks can be included as a table in the album article. --Michig (talk) 07:24, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:22, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:38, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 12:27, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with parent article until there's enough material to justify a solo article. Gamaliel (talk) 19:02, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.